<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>London SEO &#187; Search Engine News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://london-seo.com/seo/search-engine-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://london-seo.com</link>
	<description>London Search Engine Optimisation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Google bought Youtube</title>
		<link>http://london-seo.com/why-google-bought-youtube/41/</link>
		<comments>http://london-seo.com/why-google-bought-youtube/41/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>search engine optimiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slightly Off Topic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london-seo.com/why-google-bought-youtube/41/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is buying Youtube &#8211; the biggest online video sharing site, for $1.6 billion. But why would it want to? It already has Google Video Get more market share Youtube has between 40-45% market share of online video sharing. Google Video has nothing like that. So combining Google video and Youtube will mean that Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is buying Youtube &#8211; the biggest online video sharing site, for $1.6 billion. But why would it want to? It already has Google Video</p>
<p><strong>Get more market share</strong></p>
<p>Youtube has between 40-45% market share of online video sharing. Google Video has nothing like that. So combining Google video and Youtube will mean that Google almost dominates the video sharing market.</p>
<p><strong>Why pay for advertising?</strong></p>
<p>Google paid $900 million in a deal with Myspace to sell advertising space there. By buying youtube it can put all the ads it wants &#8211; and keep all the profits. At the moment Google adsense ads are on Youtube, but Youtube currently will get 70-80% of the profits. Now that Youtube is Google&#8217;s, the big G can keep 100% of the profits itself.</p>
<p><strong>The lawsuits</strong></p>
<p>Many people recon the reason Youtube hasn&#8217;t been sued yet is because they have no money to pay out. But then, Google video has <em>lots</em> of copyrighted material, and Google has <em>lots</em>of money &#8211; but where are the lawsuits against them?</p>
<p>And hey, this is Google &#8211; the guys that decided they would scan thousands of books and display (parts of) them online! And they got away with it!</p>
<p>Also some big name companies such as Warner music have already done deals with youtube. Rather than keep setting lawsuits against each other etc they work with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://london-seo.com/why-google-bought-youtube/41/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Launches Click to Call In the UK</title>
		<link>http://london-seo.com/google-launches-click-to-call-in-the-uk/20/</link>
		<comments>http://london-seo.com/google-launches-click-to-call-in-the-uk/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>search engine optimiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london-seo.com/google-launches-click-to-call-in-the-uk/20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found on Google Inside that Google are to launch a Click to Call service on Adwords. On Search Engine Round Table they show what happens when a user clicks that ad. I can see this possibly (and I stress, possibly) having a few major effects: People clicking it just to see what the icon means, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ginside.com/2006/146/google-launchs-click-call-in-the-uk/">Google Inside</a> that Google are to launch a Click to Call service on Adwords.</p>
<p><img alt="Click to call uk" title="Click to call uk" src="http://london-seo.com/images/clicktocall.png" /></p>
<p>On <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/006068.html#trackback">Search Engine Round Table</a> they show what happens when a user clicks that ad.</p>
<p>I can see this <em>possibly</em> (and I stress, <em>possibly</em>) having a few major effects:</p>
<ul>
<li>People clicking it just to see what the icon means, but not interested in the sponsor (although the sponsor probably won&#8217;t get charged unless a valid number is entered)</li>
<li>People doing the above, but enter false numbers</li>
<li>People playing pranks on their friends (by entering their number, so they get calls from random companies)</li>
<li>Or maybe people actually do want a call back.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://london-seo.com/google-launches-click-to-call-in-the-uk/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to start eavesdropping. No, really, they are!</title>
		<link>http://london-seo.com/google-to-start-eavesdropping-no-really-they-are/19/</link>
		<comments>http://london-seo.com/google-to-start-eavesdropping-no-really-they-are/19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>search engine optimiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london-seo.com/google-to-start-eavesdropping-no-really-they-are/19/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would you feel if you were looking at a web page, your phone goes off and you see an advert about an answering machine? Then you are watching the Simpsons on TV while browsing, and you get an ad on a page about a Simpsons DVD? You might think that would never happen, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you feel if you were looking at a web page, your phone goes off and you see an advert about an answering machine? Then you are watching the <span id="misp_compose_2" class="hm">Simpsons</span> on TV while browsing, and you get an ad on a page about a Simpsons DVD? You might think that would never happen, or perhaps you are just (<span id="misp_compose_5" class="hm">un</span>)lucky? But no, <em>Google is going to start something like this&#8230;</em></p>
<p><span id="more-19"></span></p>
<p><em> Peter <span id="misp_compose_6" class="hm">Norvig</span></em>, director of research at Google, said in <em>Technology Review</em> that they have a new idea, to use a PC microphone to record a small (5 second) segment of your background noise, send it to a (Google) server, and then return a relevant ad.</p>
<p>Of course, Google will almost certainly be saving this data, along with our emails, search queries etc&#8230;</p>
<p>And because it is Google it probably won&#8217;t get listed as Spyware but personally I think this is just as bad as most other spy ware programs.</p>
<p>More on <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/03/google_eavesdropping_software/?">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/03/google_eavesdropping_software/?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://london-seo.com/google-to-start-eavesdropping-no-really-they-are/19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo integrates Flickr into web search</title>
		<link>http://london-seo.com/yahoo-integrates-flickr-into-web-search/4/</link>
		<comments>http://london-seo.com/yahoo-integrates-flickr-into-web-search/4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>search engine optimiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://london-seo.com/yahoo-integrates-flickr-into-web-search/4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has taken Yahoo months to integrate Flickr into their web search. But they have finally done it. It makes sense to do so. The only reason I can see why they waited all this time was for a bit of publicity. Take a look at a sample search. Not all &#8220;[keyword] photos&#8221; use Flickr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has taken Yahoo months to integrate Flickr into their web search. But they have finally done it. It makes sense to do so. The only reason I can see why they waited all this time was for a bit of publicity. Take a look at <a target="_blank" href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=funny+photos">a sample search</a>. Not all &#8220;[keyword] photos&#8221; use Flickr results though, many still just show &#8220;Image Search Results&#8221; (search for &#8220;cat photos&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://london-seo.com/yahoo-integrates-flickr-into-web-search/4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
